Hi all,
The WSP Connect/Resume PDUs have to announce which alias they use for a
given extended method or extra header code page. The WSP Server will
respond with a WSP ConnectReply with only the short-hand 7-bit encoded
shortcut for the methods and header code pages, not their names.
See for example the code I sent on May 11th (WSP fixes, preview)...
Regards,
Olivier
: -----Original Message-----
: From: Guy Harris [mailto:gharris@xxxxxxxxx]
: Sent: dinsdag 16 oktober 2001 9:27
: To: Georg von Zezschwitz
: Cc: ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
: Subject: Re: [Ethereal-dev] WSP-patch
:
:
: In the new version of the code, "add_capabilities()" always
: gets passed
: a type of CONNECT, even for a CONNECTREPLY PDU.
:
: The type is used by "add_capabilities()" to decide whether to
: pass TRUE
: or FALSE as the second argument to "add_capability_vals()";
: that second
: argument specifies whether to add a string after the first byte of the
: capability.
:
: However, in the 5 July 2001 WSP specification, section
: 8.3.2.5 "Extended
: Methods" says
:
: When sent from client to server in the Connect PDU, the
: capability-specific parameters for the Extended Methods
: capability contain zero or more PDU Type to Method Name
: assignments. The end of the list of assignments is determined
: from the end of the capability as specified in the capability
: length. Each capability assignment contains a PDU Type and a
: Method Name. The PDU types are assigned by the client from the
: range 0x50-0x5F for methods that use the Get PDU format and the
: range 0x70-0x7F for methods that use the Post PDU format. The
: method name is a null terminated string.
:
: When sent from server to client in the ConnectReply PDU, the
: capability-specific parameters for the Extended Methods
: capability contain the zero or more PDU type codes (without the
: method names) that the server accepts and can receive.
:
: and the 4 May 2000 WSP specification says much the same thing.
:
: Section 8.3.2.6 "Header Code Pages" says something similar.
:
: This seems to imply that CONNECTREPLY should be passed, not CONNECT.
:
: I.e., the code for CONNECT, CONNECTREPLY, and RESUME should,
: I think, do
:
: if (capabilityLength > 0)
: {
: tmp_tvb =
: tvb_new_subset (tvb, offset, capabilityLength, capabilityLength);
: add_capabilities
: (wsp_tree, tmp_tvb, pdut);
: offset += capabilityLength;
: }
:
: rather than
:
: if (capabilityLength > 0)
: {
: tmp_tvb =
: tvb_new_subset (tvb, offset, capabilityLength, capabilityLength);
: add_capabilities
: (wsp_tree, tmp_tvb, CONNECT);
: offset += capabilityLength;
: }
:
: _______________________________________________
: Ethereal-dev mailing list
: Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
: http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
: