I like it! I like the ".inc" suffix.
--gilbert
Jeff Foster <jfoste@xxxxxxxxxxxx> on 09/22/2000 10:52:55 AM
To: "'Graham Bloice'" <graham.bloice@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxx,
Gilbert Ramirez <gram@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc: (bcc: Gilbert Ramirez/Tivoli Systems)
Subject: RE: [ethereal-dev] c code in ncp2222.h
per: Graham Bloice
> > What do you think? Which is cleaner?
> >
> > 1. Moving the C code into a separate compilation unit and making
> > all the data tables in the generated C non-static.
> >
> > 2. Keeping the symbols static by using #included source code and
> > putting in a comment to better explain this hack?
>
> How about putting the source code into another *.c file and #include that
?
>
> I believe that there is something similar in GTK/Glib
>
Option 6:
Create a include file with a different extension and use it i.e.
#include "ncp2222.inc"
- or -
#include "ncp2222.sup"
The extension can be whatever is acceptable to all. This will keep
code out of the .h files and allow you to do what you want.
Will this work and does it cause problems with the make routines ?
>
> > 3. Moving the C code into the python script as strings and putting it
> > in the generated C file.
> >
> > If people want it another way (that is, other than the current
> > way, which is #2), I'll change it. In the end it matters little to me.
> >
> > --gilbert
> >
Jeff Foster
jfoste@xxxxxxxxxxxx
