Ethereal-dev: Re: [ethereal-dev] 0.8.6: display bug

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: andreas.sikkema@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:18:03 +0200
> So I suspect the right fix is either to make "proto_tree_set_boolean()"
> do exactly what "proto_tree_set_uint()" does, or to nuke
> "proto_tree_set_boolean()" and use "proto_tree_set_uint()" for Boolean
> fields as well as integral fields.

I'd keep set_boolean() and have it call set_uint(). This way you're keeping 
a consistent API...

Nuking set_boolean() and using set_uint() is not intuitive (sp?)

-- 
Andreas Sikkema
andreas.sikkema@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Standing barefoot in a river of clues, most people would 
         not get their toes wet." - Brian Kantor in a.s.r.