Ethereal-dev: Re: [ethereal-dev] Re: Ethereal 0.8.5 and earlier fail with ucd-snmp 4.0.1-4

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhardaker@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 07 Apr 2000 08:52:03 -0700
>>>>> On Thu, 6 Apr 2000 21:45:10 -0700, Guy Harris <gharris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said:

Guy> I'm not sure the function, which would just be

Guy> void
Guy> snmp_set_full_objid(int x)
Guy> {
Guy> ds_set_boolean(DS_LIBRARY_ID, DS_LIB_PRINT_FULL_OID, x);
Guy> }

Guy> would take much extra memory, though; calls to the routine itself
Guy> would probably take less memory, as they'd pass two fewer
Guy> arguments.

No, its not a lot, you're absolutely right.  And compared to some of
the others its certainly trivial...  I just have this motto of why
expand it further if you don't need to.

(a fair amount of people have used our code in embedded systems that
don't have much memory)
-- 
"Ninjas aren't dangerous.  They're more afraid of you than you are of them."