Ethereal-dev: RE: [ethereal-dev] suggested feature...

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: "Neulinger, Nathan R." <nneul@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 10:16:23 -0500
Actually, no, I really meant to just have it ignore a protocol.

The filtering is simple - just type in one of the fields, i.e. "tcp" will
only show packets within the tcp protocol. 

-- Nathan

------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan Neulinger                       EMail:  nneul@xxxxxxx
University of Missouri - Rolla         Phone: (573) 341-4841
Computing Services                       Fax: (573) 341-4216


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Foster [mailto:jfoste@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 1999 9:06 AM
> To: 'Gilbert Ramirez'
> Cc: 'Guy Harris'; Neulinger, Nathan R.; 'ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [ethereal-dev] suggested feature...
> 
> 
> 
> Well... the old sniffer would just show the selected protocol 
> in the summary
> (top) window and do a decode of all protocol levels in the 
> details (middle)
> window.  SnifferPro does a decode on all protcols in the 
> summary window even
> if they aren't selected, ie.  selecting UDP will show the NFS decodes.
> 
> I did select UDP and found this interesting twist,  we have 
> NFS traffic and
> the SnifferPro shows the IP continuation packets even though 
> they aren't
> really UDP packet.  I think that would be really ugly to impliment. 
> 
> I do use this function on our sniffers and think that the 
> original request
> is for a filter that would allow you to limit the display packets to a
> certain protocol.  Correct me if I'm wrong, this is how I use it.
> 
> Jeff Foster
> jfoste@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Gilbert Ramirez [SMTP:gram@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent:	Tuesday, October 19, 1999 8:30 AM
> > To:	Jeff Foster
> > Cc:	'Guy Harris'; Neulinger, Nathan R.; 'ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxx'
> > Subject:	Re: [ethereal-dev] suggested feature...
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 07:37:14AM -0500, Jeff Foster wrote:
> > > 
> > > I use sniffers and I can tell you that it doesn't show 
> the protocols
> > that
> > > aren't selected.  I like this feature and would like to see it
> > implimented.
> > 
> > But what does it do when a particular protocol is not 
> selected... does
> > it show the rest of the packet as data (is if the 
> unselected protocols
> > were
> > sent through dissect_data() ), or does it just stop processing the
> > protocol
> > in the middle?
> > 
> > --gilbert
>