+1
The Debian packages use Lua since 1.10.2-2 without any problem.
Cheers,
Balint
2014-03-28 15:45 GMT+01:00 Nakayama Kenjiro <nakayamakenjiro@xxxxxxxxx>:
> +1
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> Howdy,
>> Is there any reason not to make wireshark 1.11.x and beyond only use Lua
>> 5.2? Right now the automated builds are getting built with 5.1.
>>
>> There's very little difference to end users (i.e., older scripts should
>> continue to work)... but for the C-code it's a lot more painful to have to
>> continue to handle both Lua versions, and it takes longer to test, fix, etc.
>> There's no real advantage to supporting both at this point, afaik. There
>> was back when Lua 5.2 was new and buggy, but 5.2 has been out since 2011.
>>
>> -hadriel
>>
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>
>> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kenjiro NAKAYAMA <nakayamakenjiro@xxxxxxxxx>
> GPG Key fingerprint = ED8F 049D E67A 727D 9A44 8E25 F44B E208 C946 5EB9
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
