Ethereal-dev: RE: [ethereal-dev] Ethereal on Solaris -- lexical scanner problem s.
Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.
From: "Brown, Wes" <Wes_Brown@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 22:13:12 -0500
Here we go, the stack trace you requested. Hm. Wonder if it's because I ran out of RAM? Seems somewhat unlikely, considering that machine has 4GB ... Regards, Wes Brown #0 0xef28800c in _libc_kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #1 0xef23a4e8 in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #2 0xef568584 in g_logv (log_domain=0xef577368 "GLib", log_level=G_LOG_LEVEL_ERROR, format=0x0, args1=0x6) at gmessages.c:389 #3 0xef56861c in g_log (log_domain=0xef577368 "GLib", log_level=G_LOG_LEVEL_ERROR, format=0xef5771b0 "could not reallocate %lu bytes") at gmessages.c:406 #4 0xef566988 in g_realloc (mem=0xef577368, size=3689871839) at gmem.c:342 #5 0x58950 in buffer_assure_space (buffer=0xf3130, space=3689869315) at buffer.c:85 #6 0x56a58 in libpcap_read (wth=0xeda98) at libpcap.c:200 #7 0x5884c in wtap_loop (wth=0xeda98, count=0, callback=0x260ac <wtap_dispatch_cb>, user=0xa5fe4 "") at wtap.c:122 #8 0x2582c in load_cap_file (fname=0x100f58 "/var/tmp/etherAAAinU4n_", cf=0xa5fe4) at file.c:216 #9 0x1bb6c in capture () at capture.c:601 #10 0x1b308 in capture_prep_ok_cb (ok_bt=0xdceb8, parent_w=0xd7b00) at capture.c:408 #11 0xef757c78 in gtk_marshal_NONE__NONE (object=0xdceb8, func=0x1acb4 <capture_prep_ok_cb>, func_data=0xd7b00, args=0xefffebc8) at gtkmarshal.c:344 #12 0xef702dbc in gtk_handlers_run (handlers=0xde510, signal=0xefffeb28, object=0xdceb8, params=0xefffebc8, after=0) at gtksignal.c:1909 #13 0xef701c38 in gtk_signal_real_emit (object=0xdceb8, signal_id=90, params=0xefffebc8) at gtksignal.c:1469 #14 0xef6feca8 in gtk_signal_emit (object=0xdceb8, signal_id=90) at gtksignal.c:552 #15 0xef641160 in gtk_button_clicked (button=0xdceb8) at gtkbutton.c:338 #16 0xef64340c in gtk_real_button_released (button=0xdceb8) at gtkbutton.c:852 #17 0xef757c78 in gtk_marshal_NONE__NONE (object=0xdceb8, func=0xef6432f8 <gtk_real_button_released>, func_data=0x0, args=0xeffff148) at gtkmarshal.c:344 #18 0xef701a68 in gtk_signal_real_emit (object=0xdceb8, signal_id=89, params=0xeffff148) at gtksignal.c:1432 #19 0xef6feca8 in gtk_signal_emit (object=0xdceb8, signal_id=89) at gtksignal.c:552 #20 0xef641028 in gtk_button_released (button=0xdceb8) at gtkbutton.c:329 #21 0xef642990 in gtk_button_button_release (widget=0xdceb8, event=0xfae80) at gtkbutton.c:712 #22 0xef757a08 in gtk_marshal_BOOL__POINTER (object=0xdceb8, func=0xef642834 <gtk_button_button_release>, func_data=0x0, args=0xeffff6c8) at gtkmarshal.c:30 #23 0xef701c80 in gtk_signal_real_emit (object=0xdceb8, signal_id=21, params=0xeffff6c8) at gtksignal.c:1484 #24 0xef6feca8 in gtk_signal_emit (object=0xdceb8, signal_id=21) at gtksignal.c:552 #25 0xef749560 in gtk_widget_event (widget=0xdceb8, event=0xfae80) at gtkwidget.c:2790 #26 0xef6c1498 in gtk_propagate_event (widget=0xdceb8, event=0xfae80) at gtkmain.c:1296 #27 0xef6c0308 in gtk_main_do_event (event=0xfae80) at gtkmain.c:753 #28 0xef5ca528 in gdk_event_dispatch (source_data=0xfae80, current_time=0xeffffc98, user_data=0x0) at gdkevents.c:2098 #29 0xef565144 in g_main_dispatch (current_time=0xeffffc98) at gmain.c:652 #30 0xef56595c in g_main_iterate (block=0, dispatch=1) at gmain.c:870 #31 0xef565b7c in g_main_run (loop=0xc6b58) at gmain.c:928 #32 0xef6bfb44 in gtk_main () at gtkmain.c:475 #33 0x25190 in main (argc=1, argv=0xeffffe9c) at ethereal.c:1366 -----Original Message----- From: Gilbert Ramirez [mailto:gram@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 1999 8:29 PM To: Guy Harris Cc: Brown, Wes; 'ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxx' Subject: Re: [ethereal-dev] Ethereal on Solaris -- lexical scanner problems. On Thu, Aug 05, 1999 at 06:18:08PM -0500, Guy Harris wrote: > > > Ethereal requires "flex" and either "bison" or Berkeley "yacc"; we > distribute the results of those programs with Ethereal, so you don't > need them to build Ethereal (unless you modify the scanner or grammar), > but we don't use the prefixing features with them, so our scanner and > parser don't have symbols prefixed with, say, "ethereal_". > > It might also be nice to, if there isn't "flex" or "bison", have the > build process run a "sed" script or something such as that to generate > the resulting ".c" file, to do the symbol renaming. Since ethereal requires flex, I'll add code to rename the symbols in the flex scanner. I'll also put in a generic #define hack for the parser, since AFAIK, it's not bison-specific, but compatible with any standard yacc. --gilbert
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ethereal-dev] Ethereal on Solaris -- lexical scanner problem s.
- From: Guy Harris
- Re: [ethereal-dev] Ethereal on Solaris -- lexical scanner problem s.
- Prev by Date: Re: [ethereal-dev] Some thoughts on the configure and build process
- Next by Date: [ethereal-dev] Sun Solaris x86 2.6 compile problem
- Previous by thread: RE: [ethereal-dev] Ethereal on Solaris -- lexical scanner problem s.
- Next by thread: Re: [ethereal-dev] Ethereal on Solaris -- lexical scanner problem s.
- Index(es):